{"id":338,"date":"2009-03-17T00:48:22","date_gmt":"2009-03-17T04:48:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/rattlebridge.com\/blog\/2009\/03\/17\/continued-update-on-legislation-and-other-related-issues\/"},"modified":"2009-03-17T00:48:22","modified_gmt":"2009-03-17T04:48:22","slug":"continued-update-on-legislation-and-other-related-issues","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/rattlebridge.com\/blog\/continued-update-on-legislation-and-other-related-issues\/","title":{"rendered":"Continued Update on Legislation and Other Related Issues"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong><font size=\"3\"><\/font><\/strong>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong><font size=\"3\">Tonight HBO featured an expose of inhumane practices on a hog farm in Wayne County, Ohio.&nbsp; It seems that an undercover investigator was hired by an association for Humane Farming (I cannot remember the exact name) to visit a large hog farm in Wayne County and document inhumane practices.&nbsp; The videos shown of old or sick hogs being euthanized by hanging from a forklift after having a chain put around the neck and hoisted were awful.&nbsp; The videos of the weaning of piglets being taken from the sows and literally thrown by a foot or an ear into holding tanks or vehicles were an assault to the emotions of animal lovers whether meat eaters or not.&nbsp; The farm owners in question were put on trial for animal cruelty, but after testimony from veterinarians as to what constitutes animal cruelty as outlined by the law in euthanasia and in hog farming, the prosecutor only got one conviction and it was not on the euthanasia. Personally, I feel like the farmers in question needed to be hung from a forklift and slung by their ears.<\/font><\/strong><strong><font size=\"3\">&nbsp;<\/font><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><font size=\"3\">This trial has given the HSUS more ammunition in its animal rights agenda. The HSUS has infiltrated so many areas of animal husbandry, including farming and dog breeding.&nbsp; While NO ONE wants to see cruelty of animals, the majority of Americans also do not want to be forced into becoming Vegans!&nbsp; There must be a middle ground.&nbsp; However, the practices of this one farm in Wayne County have opened the floodgates to the HSUS taking on the farm industry in Ohio without knowing much about farming and animal husbandry.&nbsp; I repeat, no one wants to see farm animals abused in their lives or in the slaughtering for food, but the HSUS agenda is to eliminate the supposed enslavement of animals so that there will be no animals raised for meat, eggs, hides, or by products!&nbsp; It will take a lot of lettuce and other vegetables and grains to feed the world without animal protein available.&nbsp; <br \/><\/font><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><font color=\"#ff0000\" size=\"4\"><strong><em>Following is a report that I received today about more HSUS activity:&nbsp; (WRITE YOUR NATIONAL LEGISLATOR NOW ABOUT HOW YOU FEEL ABOUT HSUS PROMOTING ITS AGENDA SO BLATANTLY.<\/em><\/strong><\/font><\/p>\n<p><font size=\"+0\"><\/font><font size=\"3\"><strong>The Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) couldn&#8217;t be happier<br \/>with the formation of a new group of Congressmen that will promote its agenda.<\/strong> <\/font><\/p>\n<p><strong><font size=\"3\">On February 18, U.S. Representatives Jim Moran (D- VA) and Elton<br \/>Gallegy (R- CA) announced the formation of a new Congressional Animal Protection Caucus. The goal of the group is to get like-minded members of Congress together and promote animal rights policy in Washington, D.C. through forums and briefings. <\/font><\/strong> <\/p>\n<p><strong><font size=\"3\">According to the Humane Society Legislative Fund (HSLF), the<br \/>legislative wing of the HSUS, the new caucus will &#8220;take lawmaking for the animals to the next level.&#8221; HSLF went on to gush in its blog, &#8220;we could not be more excited about their leadership of this new<br \/>organization of humane lawmakers.&#8221; <\/font><\/strong> <\/p>\n<p><strong><font size=\"3\">HSUS President and CEO, Wayne Pacelle was also prominently quoted in Rep. Moran&#8217;s press release announcing the caucus&#8217; formation. <\/font><\/strong> <\/p>\n<p><strong><font size=\"3\">Pacelle stated, &#8220;The newly constituted Congressional Animal Protection Caucus will help better align our federal policies with public opinion, and we are excited to work closely with its leaders and with the entire Congress to combat cruelty and abuse.&#8221; <\/font><\/strong> <\/p>\n<p><strong><font size=\"3\">As of press time, a full list of other U.S. Representatives joining<br \/>the caucus was not available. However, the USSA will let sportsmen<br \/>know as the names become available. Each member of the caucus should be contacted by constituents in their districts. <\/font><\/strong> <\/p>\n<p><strong><font size=\"3\">Representatives should be made aware of HSUS&#8217; radical anti-hunting<br \/>agenda. They also need to be aware that sportsmen expect their<br \/>representatives not to kowtow to that agenda. <\/font><\/strong> <\/p>\n<p><strong><font size=\"3\"><\/font><\/strong>&nbsp; <\/p>\n<p><strong><font color=\"#ff0000\" size=\"4\"><em>And from the the Sportsmen&#8217;s and Animal Owner&#8217;s Voting Alliance&nbsp;&nbsp; <\/em><\/font><\/strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.saova.org\"><strong><font color=\"#0000a0\" size=\"4\"><em>www.saova.org<\/em><\/font><\/strong><\/a><strong><font color=\"#ff0000\" size=\"5\"><em>&nbsp; <\/em><\/font><\/strong> <\/p>\n<p><font size=\"3\"><\/font><font color=\"#ff0000\"><strong>UPDATE ON THE HSUS NATIONWIDE ASSAULT AGAINST DOG BREEDERS AND ANIMAL OWNERS. This may be long but read through the following to get an idea of national movements: <\/strong><\/font> <\/p>\n<p><strong>ILLINOIS <\/strong> <\/p>\n<p><strong>VICTORY in Chicago!! Ald. Ed Burke (D-14) found he did not have the votes he<br \/>thought were wrapped up for his mandatory spay\/neuter bill and did not call<br \/>for a vote. According to the Chicago Tribune, Ald. Ray Suarez (31st)<br \/>appeared to oppose. &#8220;It really doesn&#8217;t make a lot of sense when you tell me<br \/>what a dog owner can do,&#8221; Suarez said. Ald. Ed Smith (28th) also said he was<br \/>opposed to it, after questioning how much it would do to prevent dog<br \/>attacks. &#8220;We&#8217;re on the wrong track,&#8221; he said.&nbsp; An underlying sentiment of<br \/>many aldermen was frustration at being forced to spend so much time on this<br \/>item rather than critical issues such as crime, budgets, and the economy.<br \/>Congratulations to all the hardworking dog clubs and special thanks to Dr.<br \/>Shannon Greeley (CVMA), Dr. Rubin (ISVMA) and Steve Dale for their<br \/>unwavering support. <\/strong> <\/p>\n<p><strong>OPPOSE SB 53 \/ HB 198 Licensing Dog Breeder.&nbsp; All information and bill links<br \/>can be found on the SAOVA website along with easy to use email tools.<br \/><\/strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.saova.org\/Illinois.html\"><strong>http:\/\/www.saova.org\/Illinois.html<\/strong><\/a><strong> <\/strong> <\/p>\n<p><strong>SB 53 has been slightly amended eliminating the beginning point for<br \/>licensing of 3 intact females.&nbsp; However, overly strict kennel standards,<br \/>excessive reporting, and unreasonable disclosures to purchasers remain.&nbsp; The<br \/>bill has no merit and is flawed beyond repair.&nbsp; SB 53 is scheduled to be<br \/>read for the 2nd time in Licensed Activities on March 17th. <\/strong> <\/p>\n<p><strong>SAOVA commends Senators Gary Dahl (R-38) and Chris Lauzen (R-25); and<br \/>Representatives Sandy Cole (R-62), Angelo Saviano (R-77), and Al Riley<br \/>(D-38) for removing themselves as cosponsors. <\/strong> <\/p>\n<p><strong>MAINE <\/strong> <\/p>\n<p><strong>HP 666, LD 964 An Act Pertaining to the Breeding and Selling of Dogs and<br \/>Cats, introduced by Representative Wendy Pieh (D-Bremen) 3\/10 and referred<br \/>3\/12 to the Committee on Agriculture, Conservation And Forestry and sent for<br \/>concurrence. <\/strong> <\/p>\n<p><strong>OPPOSE: HP 666, LD 964 is unnecessary over-regulation of dog breeders with<br \/>excessive kennel fees.&nbsp; The bill amends the definition of &#8220;breeding kennel&#8221;<br \/>to specify that 5 or more female dogs capable of breeding are the threshold<br \/>for needing a breeding kennel license. <\/strong> <\/p>\n<p><strong>HP 666, LD 964 establishes 3 categories of breeding kennels: <\/strong> <\/p>\n<p><strong>A. A breeding kennel that maintains at least 5 but no more than 10 female<br \/>dogs or cats capable of breeding is a Category 1 breeding kennel. (Fee $75) <\/strong> <\/p>\n<p><strong>B. A breeding kennel that maintains at least 11 but no more than 20 female<br \/>dogs or cats capable of breeding is a Category 2 breeding kennel. (Fee $250) <\/strong> <\/p>\n<p><strong>C. A breeding kennel that maintains 21 or more female dogs or cats capable<br \/>of breeding is a Category 3 breeding kennel. (Fee $500) <\/strong> <\/p>\n<p><strong>HP 666, LD 964 creates &#8220;conditional licensing&#8221; for new applicants until<br \/>inspections are performed and the kennel passes to the satisfaction of the<br \/>state inspectors.&nbsp; HP 666, LD 964 establishes fees for follow-up inspections<br \/>following an infraction. Should two or more follow-up inspections be needed<br \/>in any calendar year, the department shall charge the licensee a fee equal<br \/>to 50% of the original license fee for each follow-up inspection.&nbsp; If<br \/>documents necessary for registration of a dog or cat with a pedigree<br \/>registry are not provided to the buyer within 60 days of sale, the buyer is<br \/>entitled to a refund of 50% of the sale price. It also adds a new<br \/>requirement that a veterinarian must examine animal prior to sale. <\/strong> <\/p>\n<p><strong>Full text of HP0666, LD 964 can be found here:<br \/><\/strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.mainelegislature.org\/legis\/bills\/display_ps.asp?LD=964\"><strong>http:\/\/www.mainelegislature.org\/legis\/bills\/display_ps.asp?LD=964<\/strong><\/a><br \/><strong>&lt;<\/strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.mainelegislature.org\/legis\/bills\/display_ps.asp?LD=964&amp;snum=124\"><strong>http:\/\/www.mainelegislature.org\/legis\/bills\/display_ps.asp?LD=964&amp;snum=124<\/strong><\/a><strong>&gt;<br \/>&amp;snum=124 <\/strong> <\/p>\n<p><strong>Find Maine House Members here: <\/strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.maine.gov\/legis\/house\/hbiolist.htm\"><strong>http:\/\/www.maine.gov\/legis\/house\/hbiolist.htm<\/strong><\/a><strong> <\/strong> <\/p>\n<p><strong>Find Maine Senate Members here:<br \/><\/strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.state.me.us\/legis\/senate\/senators\/index.htm\"><strong>http:\/\/www.state.me.us\/legis\/senate\/senators\/index.htm<\/strong><\/a><strong> <\/strong> <\/p>\n<p><strong>For more information go to <\/strong><a href=\"http:\/\/saova.org\/maine.html\"><strong>http:\/\/saova.org\/maine.html<\/strong><\/a><strong> or contact Ann Short<br \/>jasbrittanys@comcast.net&nbsp; <\/strong> <\/p>\n<p><strong>MARYLAND <\/strong> <\/p>\n<p><strong>VICTORY in Maryland for dog breeders! SB318 would have mandated rigid<br \/>engineering standards and detailed exercise regulations for anyone owning 10<br \/>or more intact dogs. The measure also would have limited breeders to owning<br \/>no more than 50 &#8220;breeding&#8221; dogs over the age of four months. The Maryland<br \/>Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee rejected this restrictive and costly<br \/>legislation. <\/strong> <\/p>\n<p><strong>NORTH CAROLINA <\/strong> <\/p>\n<p><strong>SB 515 Prohibit Penning Of Wildlife. Sponsor: Senator Neal Hunt (R-Wake). <\/strong> <\/p>\n<p><strong>OPPOSE SB 515:&nbsp; The HSUS animal rights agenda does not need a platform in<br \/>North Carolina law.&nbsp; Fox preserves are highly regulated by our NC Wildlife<br \/>Resources Commission, consist of hundreds of acres, and contain structures<br \/>in which the fox can hide. Hunters and their families can run and train the<br \/>dogs to perform what they have been bred to do for centuries. In typical<br \/>anti-hunting, animal rights fashion, HSUS is distributing propaganda that<br \/>penning is a bloody and barbaric sport. Amazingly, Sen. Hunt chose to<br \/>believe the HSUS spin and agreed to introduce legislation that will close<br \/>ALL fox pens in North Carolina.&nbsp; SB 515 has been referred to the Senate<br \/>Committee on Agriculture\/Environment\/Natural Resources.&nbsp; <\/strong> <\/p>\n<p><strong>ACTION REQUEST: Contact the Senate Ag Committee:<br \/><\/strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.ncleg.net\/gascripts\/Committees\/Committees.asp?sAction=ViewCommitt\"><strong>http:\/\/www.ncleg.net\/gascripts\/Committees\/Committees.asp?sAction=ViewCommitt<\/strong><\/a><br \/><strong>ee<br \/>&lt;<\/strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.ncleg.net\/gascripts\/Committees\/Committees.asp?sAction=ViewCommit\"><strong>http:\/\/www.ncleg.net\/gascripts\/Committees\/Committees.asp?sAction=ViewCommit<\/strong><\/a><br \/><strong>tee&amp;sActionDetails=Senate%20Standing_66&gt;<br \/>&amp;sActionDetails=Senate%20Standing_66 <\/strong> <\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/tinyurl.com\/bzysyn\"><strong>http:\/\/tinyurl.com\/bzysyn<\/strong><\/a><strong> <\/strong> <\/p>\n<p><strong>OPPOSE: SB 460 \/ HB 460 Commercial Dog Breeders; adds commercial breeder,<br \/>commercial breeding operations to SECTION 1 G.S. 19A-21 as a category along<br \/>with pet shops and boarding kennels for the purpose of licensing, regulation<br \/>and inspection.&nbsp; <br \/>(5a) &#8220;Commercial breeder&#8221; means any person who, during any 12-month period,<br \/>maintains 15 or more adult female dogs for the primary purpose of the sale<br \/>of their offspring as companion animals.&nbsp; (5b) &#8220;Commercial breeding<br \/>operation&#8221; means the physical location or facility at which a commercial<br \/>breeder breeds or maintains adult female dogs and their offspring.&#8221; It<br \/>mandates standards for care at commercial breeding operations, including<br \/>requirements for exercise, veterinary care and record keeping to be written<br \/>by the NC Department of Agriculture at a later date and adds annual<br \/>veterinary exam and certification for females before breeding. <\/strong> <\/p>\n<p><strong>ACTION REQUEST: Contact the Senate Commerce Committee:<br \/><\/strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.ncleg.net\/gascripts\/Committees\/Committees.asp?sAction=ViewCommitt\"><strong>http:\/\/www.ncleg.net\/gascripts\/Committees\/Committees.asp?sAction=ViewCommitt<\/strong><\/a><br \/><strong>ee<br \/>&lt;<\/strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.ncleg.net\/gascripts\/Committees\/Committees.asp?sAction=ViewCommit\"><strong>http:\/\/www.ncleg.net\/gascripts\/Committees\/Committees.asp?sAction=ViewCommit<\/strong><\/a><br \/><strong>tee&amp;sActionDetails=Senate%20Standing_67&gt;<br \/>&amp;sActionDetails=Senate%20Standing_67 <\/strong> <\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/tinyurl.com\/dj9sqj\"><strong>http:\/\/tinyurl.com\/dj9sqj<\/strong><\/a><strong> <\/strong> <\/p>\n<p><strong>This is reactive legislation to the recent closure of a substandard kennel<br \/>in Wayne County widely publicized by HSUS. Closing of the kennel and removal<br \/>of the dogs is evidence that current law adequately dealt with the<br \/>situation.&nbsp; State licensing and regulation as a commercial entity will end<br \/>dog breeding for anyone in a residential zoned area. The impact in<br \/>rural-residential zoned areas will depend on zoning ordinances already in<br \/>place for each county and the final requirements for housing established by<br \/>the NC Department of Agriculture. <\/strong> <\/p>\n<p><strong>The bills define as commercial anyone maintaining 15 females during the span<br \/>of 12 months; does not say intact females, does not define what age is<br \/>considered adult. The requirement for annual veterinary certification of<br \/>suitable health for breeding is very vague. Certification could require<br \/>anything from routine physical exam to an expensive panel of blood tests and<br \/>x-rays. There is no definition of suitable health for breeding. The bill<br \/>prohibits breeding females less than 18 months or more than 8 years. This is<br \/>a precursor for state mandated breeding restrictions. <\/strong> <\/p>\n<p><strong>More information and contacts here: <\/strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.saova.org\/northcarolina.html\"><strong>http:\/\/www.saova.org\/northcarolina.html<\/strong><\/a><strong> <\/strong> <\/p>\n<p><strong>TENNESSEE <\/strong> <\/p>\n<p><strong>OPPOSE SB 258: Commercial Breeder Act <\/strong> <\/p>\n<p><strong>Find talking points and contact information here:<br \/><\/strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.saova.org\/Tennessee.html\"><strong>http:\/\/www.saova.org\/Tennessee.html<\/strong><\/a><strong> <\/strong> <\/p>\n<p><strong>Senate Bill 258, sponsored by Sen. Doug Jackson (D-25) and House Bill 386,<br \/>sponsored by Rep. Janis Baird Sontany (D-53) places breeding of purebred<br \/>dogs under criminal animal cruelty statutes. The bills classify a Commercial<br \/>breeder as any person who possesses or maintains twenty (20) or more adult<br \/>female dogs in whole or in part for the purpose of the sale of their<br \/>offspring as companion animals. If even one litter of puppies is produced, a<br \/>commercial breeder licensing would be required. Ownership of 75 is the<br \/>absolute limit.&nbsp;&nbsp; Background checks will be required for applicants, and the<br \/>state will determine if the applicant is of good moral character and<br \/>deserving of the license. <\/strong> <\/p>\n<p><strong>HSUS State Director, Leighann McCollum, responding on behalf of Sen. Doug<br \/>Jackson confirmed that USDA regulations currently in effect under the Dog<br \/>and Cat Dealer Act (44-17-101) will be required for the new commercial<br \/>breeder kennels. Senate Bill 258 was referred to Senate Committee Commerce<br \/>Labor &amp; Agriculture Feb. 19; no hearings are scheduled at this time. <\/strong> <\/p>\n<p><strong>TEXAS <\/strong> <\/p>\n<p><strong>HB 458 Pet Limits in Counties. Sponsored by Rep. David Lieberman (D-117). <\/strong> <\/p>\n<p><strong>OPPOSE: Allows counties to impose dog limit laws in unincorporated areas,<br \/>changing the rules on pet owners who have bought homes with no HOA or<br \/>dog-related deed restrictions. <\/strong> <\/p>\n<p><strong>ACTION REQUEST: HB 458 is scheduled for a hearing Monday, March 16th, 2 PM<br \/>in E2.016 at the State Capitol, Austin.&nbsp; If you cannot attend the hearing<br \/>please call or fax.&nbsp; <\/strong> <\/p>\n<p><strong>SB 634 Relating to the unlawful restraint of a dog. Sponsored by Sen. Ken<br \/>Seliger (R-31) <\/strong> <\/p>\n<p><strong>HB 2001 Companion bill Sponsored by Rep. Brian McCall (R-66) <\/strong> <\/p>\n<p><strong>OPPOSE: Would prohibit tethering under any condition, mandates 150 SF kennel<br \/>requirements, does not allow dogs to be outside unattended at all during<br \/>inclement weather (hunting dogs are not exempt). Requirements are<br \/>unreasonable for lower income and elderly dog owners and will result in<br \/>increased kill rates at shelters due to owner surrenders, or more dogs at<br \/>large and therefore dog bites. <\/strong> <\/p>\n<p><strong>SB 554 An act relating to conduct constituting the offense of dog fighting<br \/>and to the criminal and civil consequences of committing that offense;<br \/>sponsored by Sen. John Whitmire (D-15). <\/strong> <\/p>\n<p><strong>OPPOSE: Criminalizes the ownership of &#8220;dog fighting equipment,&#8221; with the<br \/>intent that the equipment be used to train a dog for fighting, including<br \/>items common to show and working dog owners: harness, treadmill, cage,<br \/>decoy, pen, house for keeping a dog, feeding apparatus or training pen.<br \/>Intent is difficult to prove and would likely be applied selectively based<br \/>on breed of dog. <\/strong> <\/p>\n<p><strong>ACTION REQUEST: SB 554 is scheduled for a hearing March 17th , 1:30 PM in<br \/>E1.016 (Hearing Room) State Capitol, Austin. If you cannot attend the<br \/>hearing please call or fax.&nbsp; <\/strong> <\/p>\n<p><strong>SB 1845 Relating to the sterilization of dogs and cats; providing a penalty.<br \/>Sponsored by Sen. Leticia Van de Putte (D-26) <\/strong> <\/p>\n<p><strong>HB 4277 Identical bill by Rep. Jose Menendez (D-124) <\/strong> <\/p>\n<p><strong>OPPOSE: These are statewide mandatory spay\/neuter bills for dogs and cats<br \/>over 6 months of age. <\/strong> <\/p>\n<p><strong>HB 3180 Relating to the licensing and regulation of commercial dog and cat<br \/>breeders and the regulation of dog and cat dealers; providing penalties.<br \/>Sponsored by Rep. Senfronio Thompson (D-81) <\/strong> <\/p>\n<p><strong>SB 1910 Identical bill sponsored by Sen. John Whitmire (D-15). <\/strong> <\/p>\n<p><strong>OPPOSE: Imposes excessive reporting; stringent kennel standards, grooming,<br \/>exercise, socialization, and breeding standards. Defines commercial breeder<br \/>as anyone who possesses 11 or more adult intact females; breeder may not<br \/>possess more than 50 at any time.&nbsp; <\/strong> <\/p>\n<p><strong>Text of bills, summaries, contact information, action alerts can be found<br \/>at: <\/strong> <\/p>\n<p><strong>Lone Star State American Pit Bull Terrier Club<br \/><\/strong><a href=\"http:\/\/lsspbc.com\/blog\/2009\/03\/13\/txbills\/\"><strong>http:\/\/lsspbc.com\/blog\/2009\/03\/13\/txbills\/<\/strong><\/a><strong> <\/strong> <\/p>\n<p><strong>Responsible Pet Owners Alliance www.rpoatexasoutreach.org<br \/>&lt;<\/strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.rpoatexasoutreach.org\/\"><strong>http:\/\/www.rpoatexasoutreach.org\/<\/strong><\/a><strong>&gt;&nbsp; <\/strong> <\/p>\n<p><strong>Please share this message widely. <\/strong> <\/p>\n<p><strong>Susan Wolf <\/strong> <\/p>\n<p><strong>Sportsmen&#8217;s and Animal Owners&#8217; Voting Alliance &#8211;&nbsp; &lt;<\/strong><a href=\"http:\/\/saova.org\"><strong>http:\/\/saova.org<\/strong><\/a><strong>&gt;<br \/><\/strong><a href=\"http:\/\/saova.org\"><strong>http:\/\/saova.org<\/strong><\/a><br \/><strong>Issue lobbying and working to identify and elect supportive legislators<\/strong>  <\/p>\n<p>&lt;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&nbsp; Tonight HBO featured an expose of inhumane practices on a hog farm in Wayne County, Ohio.&nbsp; It seems that an undercover investigator was hired by an association for Humane Farming (I cannot remember the exact name) to visit a large hog farm in Wayne County and document inhumane practices.&nbsp; The videos shown of old [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[2,4,21],"tags":[47],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/rattlebridge.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/338"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/rattlebridge.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/rattlebridge.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rattlebridge.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rattlebridge.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=338"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/rattlebridge.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/338\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/rattlebridge.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=338"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rattlebridge.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=338"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rattlebridge.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=338"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}