{"id":503,"date":"2009-10-13T00:50:47","date_gmt":"2009-10-13T04:50:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/rattlebridge.com\/blog\/2009\/10\/13\/one-big-win-for-our-side\/"},"modified":"2009-10-13T00:50:47","modified_gmt":"2009-10-13T04:50:47","slug":"one-big-win-for-our-side","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/rattlebridge.com\/blog\/one-big-win-for-our-side\/","title":{"rendered":"One Big Win for Our Side!"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/em>  <\/p>\n

In the continued war against those who would take our rights to own and breed dogs away, the Louisville Kennel Club sued Louisville\/Jefferson County Metro Government against the legislation which would affect dog shows, owning dogs, breeding dogs, and all dog related activities.  Those that owned altered dogs did not have to obey the requirements imposed on unaltered. A few years ago many of us were afraid to show at the Louisville Kennel Dog shows in March fearing that our dogs would be targeted. The following is from the AKC website: <\/font><\/strong> <\/p>\n

Tuesday, October 06, 2009 <\/strong><\/font><\/em> <\/p>\n

Late Friday, United States District Court Judge Charles R. Simpson, III, of the Western District of Kentucky issued his decision in the case of the Louisville Kennel Club, Inc. v. Louisville\/Jefferson County Metro Government<\/em>. A significant victory for the Louisville Kennel Club, the judge\u2019s decision features two key rulings that may also prove to be of great importance for dog owners nationwide. <\/strong><\/font> <\/p>\n

First, Judge Simpson held that there was no rational basis why owners of unaltered dogs should be treated differently than the owners of altered dogs. This declared the part of the ordinance that required owners of unaltered dogs to get the Director\u2019s written approval for those dogs\u2019 enclosures (owners of altered dogs did not have such a requirement) as an unconstitutional violation of Equal Protection and Substantive Due Process. <\/strong><\/font> <\/p>\n

Reiterating another court\u2019s earlier decision that recognized that dogs are personal property, the judge further held Louisville\u2019s seizure bond requirement as an unconstitutional violation of procedural due process rules. This requirement, which required anyone accused of animal cruelty to post bond for the care of their seized animals, would have resulted in the forfeiture of animals if they were not able to pay for the bond regardless of whether or not they were later determined to be innocent. <\/strong><\/font> <\/p>\n

“We congratulate the Louisville Kennel Club and their co-plaintiffs on their leadership in opposing the Louisville ordinance,” said Dennis Sprung, President and CEO of the American Kennel Club. “We are confident that this decision will encourage communities to consider the interests of responsible dog breeders and owners when making changes to their animal ordinances.” <\/strong><\/font> <\/p>\n

Keep up with all dog related legislation at the AKC website: AKC.org<\/strong><\/font><\/p>\n

For more information, contact AKC\u2019s Government Relations Department at (919) 816-3720, or e-mail <\/strong><\/font>doglaw@akc.org<\/strong><\/font><\/a>.<\/strong><\/font><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

  In the continued war against those who would take our rights to own and breed dogs away, the Louisville Kennel Club sued Louisville\/Jefferson County Metro Government against the legislation which would affect dog shows, owning dogs, breeding dogs, and all dog related activities.  Those that owned altered dogs did not have to obey the […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[20,31],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/rattlebridge.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/503"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/rattlebridge.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/rattlebridge.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rattlebridge.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rattlebridge.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=503"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/rattlebridge.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/503\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/rattlebridge.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=503"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rattlebridge.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=503"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rattlebridge.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=503"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}